Can the apartment industry benefit from benchmarking against other industry standards? Are the metrics that property management company’s use in sync with the changing world? Maybe what we have always done isn’t producing as favorable of a result as what we could with a paradigm shift. Brent William’s blog post about lease renewals and how they stack up against cell phone plan renewals has provoked contemplation on the topic. The cell phone companies have likely created a renewal model that does work better than a typical apartment renewal. The rent increase argument is flawed and can be diffused with an increased renewal percentage. The cost of getting a unit market ready, leasing and marketing cost is far more than a rent increase. Rent increases are certainly required, but perhaps a more targeted approach would provide a better yield. The whole concept is convoluted, on one hand we ask for a rent increase, and on the other hand sometimes give away something to secure the renewal.
What if the apartment leases self renewed, similar to the cell phone renewal policy. What if the burden to terminate the lease was solely on the resident and we didn’t talk about it much after the lease signing? What if you redeployed the savings from managing the renewal process to a planned and systematic series of surprises? Change the lease term to something other than a standard twelve months, so with one auto renewal, the property exceeded the typical 50% or 60% retention target. How it is ever OK to say that half or close to half of your customer base is turning over year after year. It isn’t OK, and we should find an innovative way to solve this.
The current thinking and training may be flawed.
Ideas, comments, thoughts, we would love to hear them.
You can check out Brent’s blog post here
